Skip to content

Live · Oct 19, 2026

Vol. 12 · Nº292Monday Edition

Learn English with attitude

Current Affairs English

Nothing is normal — question everything

Sign in / Register

Hot Takes Listening Business Education Health International

Hot Takes Listening Business Education Health International Geopolitics Technology Travel Environmental Interplanetary Financial HistoricalClasses About Plans & Pricing Quick guides

Learn English intelligently, not artificially!

ExploreBrowse articles Hot Takes Quick guides Classes About Plans & Pricing

AccountSign in Register My Area

LegalPrivacy Policy Data Deletion

Language

© 2026 Current Affairs English · Est. 2014

Built with love by setstate.info

№ 01 — Lead · International

Sanctioning the Referee: The US vs. the ICC

25 October 2025·5 min read·International·B2· Upper intermediate

Contents

Your Progress

0 of 3 exercises0%

§ 01

Listen to the full report

Audio

0:00 · playedremaining 0:00

§ 02

Audio Word Matching

2 sets

Want a vocabulary drill from this episode? Finish the Audio Quiz to unlock the transcript — the gap-fill drill is underneath it.

§ 03

Audio Quiz

8 questions

§ 04

Audio Transcript

+ gap fill

Locked

Finish the Audio Quiz to read the transcript.

Answer all the audio questions to read the text of the audio.

Quiz progress

0 of 8 answered

§ 05

Audio Discussion

7 questions

Discussion Questions

How real-time discussion works

Share your thoughts and get personalised feedback on your English
Real-time feedback helps improve your grammar, vocabulary, and critical thinking
You can reply and continue the conversation on each question
Real-time requests are limited per hour to ensure fair usage

01

If investigations need a suspect’s “consent,” what is left of an independent court—due process or public relations?

02

When a superpower freezes a judge’s assets, is that rule of law—or rule by leverage? Where is the line for you?

03

France calls the move a contradiction of an independent judiciary; Israel praises it. Who gains and who loses from each stance, and why?

04

The UN warns of “severe impediments” to the prosecutor’s office. What practical effects might that create for victims seeking justice?

05

US policy swung from sanction to rescind to sanction again. Is this strategy, domestic politics, or message-sending—and how could other states respond?

06

Danya Chaikel frames this as a test for 125 member states. If you were advising a midsize democracy, would you publicly defend the ICC or quietly step back?

07

Should courts investigating atrocity crimes be insulated from financial pressure the way central banks are insulated from politics? How?

§ 06

Personal Notes

Auto-saved

Loading notes…