What was the study’s primary shift in perspective?
2
In the “naming game,” what mechanism drives convergence?
3
Which statement best reflects the study’s finding on bias?
4
What did the study reveal about minority influence?
5
Why does this work matter for near-term AI ecosystems?
6
What “blind spot” in AI safety does the study highlight?
7
Which analogy best captures how the group reached stable labels?
8
Which governance step most directly addresses the risks raised here?
9
Choose the Best Summary
10
Match the word to its definition
11
Match the word to its definition
12
emergent
Please answer all questions to see your score
Match the word to a contextual synonym
Drag words to match with their definitions. Progress: 0/4 words attempted
You must attempt to move all words to complete the exercise.
Words
Definitions
align
organize
extend
guide
Discussion Questions
💡 How AI Discussion Works
• Share your thoughts and get personalized feedback on your English
• The AI will help improve your grammar, vocabulary, and critical thinking
• You can have back-and-forth conversations on each question
• Limited to 5 AI requests per hour to ensure fair usage
In human communities, slang and etiquette often emerge without formal rules. Should we expect similar “culture formation” among AI agents—and how might that shape online discourse?
If bias can arise between agents, what kinds of oversight (technical or legal) could monitor interactions, not just individual models?
Is it acceptable for a small cluster of AIs to nudge group outcomes if it increases efficiency? Where would you draw the line?
Design a policy brief (150–200 words) advising a platform that hosts AI-to-AI interactions: what metrics should it track to detect harmful conventions?
My Notes
Loading notes...
When AIs Hang Out: How Language Models Invent Rules, Biases, and “Mini-Societies”