Answer all the listening questions to read the text of the audio.
Quiz progress
0 of 9 answered
§ 05
Audio Grammar
4 forms
§ 06
Audio Discussion
5 questions
Discussion Questions
How real-time discussion works
Share your thoughts and get personalised feedback on your English
Real-time feedback helps improve your grammar, vocabulary, and critical thinking
You can reply and continue the conversation on each question
Real-time requests are limited per hour to ensure fair usage
01
The audio describes a system where the rules of financial markets can be changed by a small group of powerful people. Do you think it is fair that those with wealth and influence can shape the systems that affect everyone? Who, if anyone, should have the power to change these rules?
02
The speaker says that ordinary people are having overvalued shares placed into their retirement funds without their knowledge or consent. Do you think people have a right to know exactly what their pension or savings plan is investing in? Why is this kind of transparency so difficult to achieve?
03
The report describes a financial system where those who are already very rich are able to use the savings of ordinary workers to protect their own wealth. Is this an unavoidable feature of capitalism, or is it a sign that the system has become deeply broken? What would a fairer alternative look like?
04
The audio mentions that 40% of companies see their stock value drop by more than half after an IPO. If most ordinary investors end up losing money in these situations, while early investors get rich, do you think governments have a moral duty to step in and protect people? Or should individuals simply accept the risks of investing?
05
The speaker uses very emotional language — words like "immoral", "tragic", and "trap". Do you think this kind of tone is helpful for making people understand a complicated financial issue, or does it make it harder to think clearly about what is actually happening? Can anger be a useful tool for social change?
