Finish the vocabulary practice — or open the Gap fill tab — to reveal the text version of this post.
Vocabulary practice0 of 2 matched
§ 01
Vocabulary Practice
2 sets+ gap fill
Showing Matching
§ 02
Comprehension Quiz
5 questions
§ 03
Real-time Discussion
4 questions
Discussion Questions
How real-time discussion works
Share your thoughts and get personalised feedback on your English
Real-time feedback helps improve your grammar, vocabulary, and critical thinking
You can reply and continue the conversation on each question
Real-time requests are limited per hour to ensure fair usage
01
The post argues that the plantation "received a different name and a legal foundation." In your view, does changing the name of a system — from "slavery" to "criminal justice" — change its fundamental nature? What makes a system exploitative, regardless of what it is called? What does it say about a society when it allows this kind of renaming to continue for generations without serious public debate?
02
The post notes that the prison population is disproportionately Black and poor, and disproportionately from zip codes with failed schools and abandoned infrastructure. If the conditions that lead to incarceration — poverty, lack of education, unemployment — are themselves products of historical injustice, can a society truly claim its justice system is fair? What would genuine justice require?
03
Major brands such as McDonald's, Walmart, and Victoria's Secret profit from prison labour paid as little as 13 cents an hour. As a consumer, what responsibility — if any — do you believe individuals have when they buy products made in this way? And what responsibility do corporations have? Is it enough to say "it is legal"?
04
The United States publicly condemns authoritarian states for human rights violations while maintaining the world's largest prison population, inside which forced labour is legal. What does this contradiction reveal about how powerful countries define and apply the concept of "human rights"? Who gets to decide what counts as a human rights violation — and who benefits from those definitions?