Finish the vocabulary practice — or open the Gap fill tab — to reveal the text version of this post.
Vocabulary practice0 of 2 matched
§ 01
Vocabulary Practice
2 sets+ gap fill
Showing Matching
§ 02
Reading Quiz
5 questions
§ 03
Real-time Discussion
4 questions
Discussion Questions
How real-time discussion works
Share your thoughts and get personalised feedback on your English
Real-time feedback helps improve your grammar, vocabulary, and critical thinking
You can reply and continue the conversation on each question
Real-time requests are limited per hour to ensure fair usage
01
In the context of Larry Ellison's acquisition of TikTok and subsequent censorship of terms like 'Zionist' and pro-Palestine content, how does the control of social media platforms by billionaires threaten the concept of "neutral ground" mentioned in the post? What are the implications for free speech and public discourse?
02
The post suggests that audiences "migrate fast" when platforms become tools of power. Given the documented censorship of anti-genocide posts on TikTok, where can users realistically migrate to for genuine neutrality? Are there any truly neutral social media spaces left, or is this an illusion?
03
When billionaires like Ellison can ban certain political viewpoints (such as criticism of Israeli policies) from major platforms, how does this affect society's ability to discuss human rights issues and hold governments accountable? What responsibility, if any, should platform owners have toward facilitating honest public debate?
04
The post states that "culture leaves first" when trust is lost. Considering the oppression of Palestinian voices and pro-Palestine content on TikTok, what does it mean for global culture when narratives about genocide and human rights violations can be systematically silenced? How does this censorship shape what future generations will understand about current events?